Extra username and password are expected for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details
refers to regulation that comes from decisions made by judges in previous cases. Case regulation, also known as “common law,” and “case precedent,” delivers a common contextual background for certain legal concepts, And just how they are applied in certain types of case.
Case files may additionally be accessed from the public access terminals inside the clerk’s office of your court where the case was filed.
competent authority and when any appeal or representation is filed the same shall be decided(Promotion)
94 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It can be perfectly-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within 90 times. If the appeal is not really decided within that timeframe, he/she will be able to then solution the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as being the 90 times for that department to act has already expired. On the aforesaid proposition, we're guided with the decision of the Supreme Court inside the case of Dr.
The different roles of case regulation in civil and common legislation traditions create differences in how that courts render decisions. Common legislation courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale driving their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and often interpret the broader legal principles.
148 . Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Provided the legal analysis on the subject issue, we are from the view that the claim of your petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Original contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle is not really legally seem, Other than promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, they are issue read more to rules and regulations Should the recruitment rules of the topic post allow the case on the petitioners for promotion could be regarded, however, we're clear in our point of view that contractual service cannot be deemed for seniority and promotion because the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Health and fitness, subject to availability of vacancy matter on the approval on the competent authority. Read more
A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar trouble. When they sue their landlord, the court must use the previous court’s decision in applying the legislation. This example of case regulation refers to two cases listened to within the state court, for the same level.
Section 302 in the PPC outlines the punishment for “Qatl-i-Amd” (intentional murder) in Pakistan. According to this provision, if a person intentionally causes the death of another individual, they shall be matter into the most severe form of punishment permissible under Pakistani law.
When the petitioner is actually present for the place of incidence without causing any injury to the deceased or PWs then in such circumstances, whether He's vicariously liable shall be decided with the learned trial Court after recording of the evidence.
Legal Defenses: An accused person charged under Section 302 PPC can present legal defenses such as self-defense, insanity, or accidental killing, which might lead to reduced charges or acquittal.
this Court is remaining with no option but to direct the respondents to notify the promotion from the petitioner in next rank .(Promotion)
When the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC might dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had an opportunity to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC could allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is frequently only done When the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence as well as the petitioner company responded towards the allegations as such they were effectively conscious of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use to get looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 173 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials acting within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case legislation previously rendered on similar cases.